This Russian announcement prompted NATO secretary-general Jens
Stoltenberg to bloviate that this coming Russian deployment is one of the reasons for the NATO buildup.
In other words, the cause of something in the past lies in a subsequent event.
The future caused something to happen in the past. [2]
In the universe as most of us experience it, events that
occur later in time do not cause events earlier in time.
But apparently the laws of physics are not binding in the
world of Western imperialist apparatchiks. And no propaganda statement is too
obviously ludicrous not to be treated
as true
by Western media propagandists. And Stoltenberg knew this or he never would have made his absurd statement.
Whatever one thinks of Putin’s move, it CANNOT POSSIBLY HAVE
CAUSED SOMETHING TO HAPPEN IN THE PAST. Unless one is a flaked-out mystic.
Maybe Stoltenberg should cast a spell on Putin with some eye of Newt and a bat
wing. Or use some magic crystals to ward off the Russian evil.
1] “Russian
aggression” refers to Russian support for the eastern Ukrainian separatists,
and the reunification of Crimea and Russia, first voted for by over 90% of
Crimean residents who participated in a referendum and then ratified by the Russian
parliament, the Duma, is called “aggression,” and frequently painted as a
precursor to a Russian invasion of the Baltics, Poland, etc.- an absurd,
paranoiac fantasy used to justify a revival of the so-called “Cold War” by “the
West,” that is, the U.S. and its European “partners” and other hangers-on like
Canada.)
2] A European
civilian traditionally acts as a U.S. puppet “head” of NATO. NATO is actually
run by an American general at all times, and always has been. The secretary-generals are always picked for
their reactionary attitudes and fealty to U.S. imperialism.
Stoltenberg’s statement was : "This nuclear saber rattling of Russia
is unjustified, it’s destabilizing, and it’s dangerous. And this is something
which we are addressing, and it’s also one of the reasons why we now are
increasing the readiness and the preparedness of our forces. And we are
responding [sic] by making sure that NATO also in the future is an alliance
which provides deterrence and protection for all allies against any
threat."
No comments:
Post a Comment