Who do you imagine will succeed "The Donald" if you succeed?
Mike Pence, the religious fanatic and extreme reactionary, becomes president.
Pence's
domestic policies will be every bit as bad, and probably worse in some
areas (such as the war against abortion rights) than Trump's.
On
foreign policy, at least Trump is internally divided. He has
"isolationist" (noninterventionist) impulses, so part of the time you
get that, while at other times you get a violent lashing out, as the
attack on the Assad regime airfield in Syria after the sarin attack by
that regime- my only complaint about that Trump attack is that it was
ineffectual. Plus, Trump isn't particularly interested in foreign
policy. Therefore U.S. imperialism under Trump would probably be less
focuses, less intense, and less assiduously imposed everywhere possible
at all times than is the norm. Which is a MAJOR REASON the power
establishment (political, media, and Deep State, which includes the
military and secret police organizations) is so intent on hamstringing
or, if possible, ousting Trump.
Pence can be expected to be
much like Reagan and the Bushes on foreign policy; aggressively violent,
employing the military and CIA very extensively.
Even worse, is that Pence
projects a low-key, non-threatening, friendly and placid demeanor. In a word, he comes across as
amiable. Thus he will be
the more effective evil. Just as Obama was the
more effective evil than
Bush II, or than McCain or Romney would have been. Simply put, the
"nice guy" personas of state criminals like Obama and Pence simply don't
arouse the public opposition that Republicans generally and especially
politicians who come across as intense do.
So Trump is a horror, but Pence would be worse.
By
the way, Obama was a horror, Bush the Younger was a horror, Clinton was
a horror, Bush the Elder was a horror, Reagan the fascist was a horror,
Ford helped Indonesia invade East Timor and exterminate a third of the
population (with Kissinger at his side, a policy continued by Clinton),
Nixon (enough said), Johnson sent a 550,000 invasion force into Vietnam,
and invaded the Dominican Republic to reverse an election he didn't
like, and arranged for military dictatorship in Brazil, a U.S. plot
begun by Kennedy, who created a U.S. torturer-training program in Latin
America under the rubric of the "Alliance for Progress," and Eisenhower
was responsible for the CIA coups in Iran (1953) and Guatemala (1954)
which ushered in two of the world's most murderous dictatorship, a
quarter million people murdered in each case, and the consequences still
being suffered by the peoples of those countries to this day. Truman,
the man who atomic-bombed two cities, enough said- and I could go back
and back, indeed all the way to Washington, but there are too many, and
the crimes are literally in the tens of thousands. because imperialism
is a criminal enterprise, and the U.S. was imperialist from the
beginning, when white colonizers "discovered" the Western Hemisphere,
and eliminated in North American over 90% of the people whose ancestors
predated the Europeans' arrival by 15,000 years, in order to seize the
land and resources.
The point is, Trump is not uniquely bad.
That's the establishment line, because he's unpredictable and not
anchored to their ideology. That means there are possibilities for
cracks in the system to open. That is one reason people instinctively
voted for him- on the hope he would "shake things up." Of course he
won't deliver on his promises, but he IS a destabilizing presence in the
White House. If nothing else, the attention of the criminal rulers is
somewhat diverted by their obsession with demonizing, "investigating,"
undermining, neutralizing, and ultimately ousting him. That gives the
world's population a bit of breathing space, or a lessening in the
intensity of U.S. attacks (including perhaps domestic dissidents, with
the FBI and CIA and NSA prioritizing their conspiracies against Trump).
The
U.S. is a nation founded on the twin pillars of genocide and slavery,
which has, with the immense power it has amassed, a world-historic
opportunity to change the nature of civilization, but instead is simply
repeating the same millenia-old game of domination, exploitation, and
oppression. (By the way, committing genocide has been a very good way to
get to the White House. For example, Andrew Jackson, exterminator of
the Creek Indians, got to be President, as did William Henry Harrison,
who destroyed the Confederacy of Northwest Tribes and oversaw the
elimination of the charismatic native leader Tecumseh.)
In
America now, we see a colossal waste of power and the squandering of a
world-historic opportunity to change the world for the better. And what
a lack of ambition this bespeaks. The ambition to do something truly
great and world-changing. With its unparalleled power, the U.S. could
put humanity on a truly civilized path. Instead Americans prefer to
delude themselves that their nation-state (and by extension, themselves)
are "great" simply because they are powerful. But since the power is
largely (not entirely) used for evil, their "greatness" is of a piece
with the "greatness" of the Soviet Union and the Third Reich. It may be
awesome, but it is not admirable. It is anti-human, as we see even
today, yet again, with President Trump and his Secretary of State, Rex
"Gusher" Tillerson, praising the Saudi oppressors, among the very worst
in the world, while simultaneously, with the maximal hypocrisy typical
of the U.S. government, slamming Iran for its repression and
"terrorism." (Trump and his gang talk as if
IRAN is behind ISIS and Al-Qaeda, not Saudi Arabia!)
The blather and bullshit sure gets repetitive after awhile.
Too
bad so many of the fellow travelers of the Democratic Party, who should
know better, are mindlessly parroting the propaganda lines of that
Party and its secret police temporary allies-of-convenience. (Rather
stunning to hear Democracy Now boss Amy Goodman repeatedly saying the
phrase "Russian meddling" in the U.S. election!)
Maybe putting
things in historical and political perspective would help them think
more clearly. No need to take sides in a battle between Godzilla and
Mothra. (Trump and his establishment enemies.) The proper response is
to illuminate what is happening, including the real causes of the
conflict, to report objectively and demystify the show that is being
presented in the Bourgeois Media Theater.
Typical victims of U.S. "Defense of Freedom"
American Heroes with captive Woman
